FR
Reading comfort

Preferences stay on this device when storage is available.

Our accessibility approach
Book a workshop
MenuClose

The course · free · no account

Understand AI. From a first ‘aha’ moment to better judgment.

A guided course in seven modules: understand, experiment, verify and decide, at your own pace.

Start the course Try the 10⁠-⁠minute experience

7 modules · 60–⁠90 min, as a planning estimate · Activities and a final assessment · No technical prerequisites

Teaching simulations, with no live AI. Progress stays on this device; entered text is not saved. Paid OYEE workshops take place exclusively in person.

Module 1 of 7

Open the machine

Understand what generative AI does and what it does not guarantee.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

Generative AI produces text, images or other content from patterns learned during training. For a language model, producing an answer involves successive predictions of tokens: words, word pieces or symbols.

Context includes the instructions and information available when an answer is generated. Describing the audience and task changes what the model may propose. That is not a fact-check.

Confident wording proves neither human understanding nor accuracy. The tool can help explore or rephrase ideas; a person still needs to judge the result for its intended use.

Your task: open at least two layers in the diagram. Change the audience. Identify where a person acts before and after generation.

Exploded view 1 of 4

What flows through
Explain AI to my team.

Your message

Explain AI to my team.

It starts with you. A question, a context, an intention.

The pieces

Explain · AI · to · my · team

Text becomes tokens: parts of words, words or symbols. The boundaries shown here are simplified.

The prediction

tool / system / technology

The model calculates possible continuations from context. A likely continuation can still be wrong.

Your judgment

Is it accurate? Useful? Suitable?

You compare against sources, identify limitations and decide what to use. Your judgment remains essential.

Teaching view: these layers represent stages, not a model’s physical architecture. Preset examples, no live AI.

Check your understanding

A very confident answer is…

Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.

Turn the view with the buttons, or drag it. Choose a part to see it up close.

Open the machine.

A teaching model, not the physical structure of a neural network. Examples and probabilities are illustrative.

Module 2 of 7

Prediction is not knowledge

Distinguish probability, variation and accuracy.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

A next token receives a probability based on context. The answer is built one piece at a time. A natural-sounding continuation can include invented information.

Temperature changes the distribution used for sampling. In this simulation, a low temperature concentrates possibilities; a higher temperature spreads them out. This setting does not measure truth.

Comparing two outputs can reveal variation. To know which is accurate, you need independent evidence: a source document, an observation or a check suited to the task.

Your task: try two contexts and two temperatures, then sample a word. Look at the shape of the probabilities, not only the chosen word.

Change the context and the temperature, then sample a word.

0.7

Temperature reshapes the probabilities. It measures neither truth nor intelligence.

Which word will come out?

Possible futures Illustrative probabilities

Your samples

A likely continuation is not evidence. The same machine can produce a fluent sentence and a convincing mistake. Try two contexts and two temperatures, then sample a word.

Check your understanding

Does a lower temperature guarantee truth?

Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.

Module 3 of 7

Follow the evidence

Distinguish a supported, contradicted or unstated claim.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

A summary can add details absent from its source. Before sharing, separate the claims: who, what, when, how much, and supported by what evidence?

Supported means the source backs the claim. Contradicted means it says something incompatible. Not stated means it does not let you conclude. Missing information is not automatically proof of the opposite.

A reference supplied by a tool also needs checking: does it exist, does it say what is attributed to it, and is it relevant? A well-formatted citation can be incorrect.

Your task: classify all three claims using only the supplied document. Revise your choices by referring to the words in the source.

Fictional document

Meeting notes, Riverside Library

The team proposes a 90⁠-⁠minute workshop to explore AI. The room can hold 24 people. The date is yet to be confirmed. Free registration is being considered, but the budget has not yet been approved.

Your only source for this experiment.

Summary to check

Return to the source. Distinguish “supported”, “contradicted” and “not stated”. This is the reasoning we practise together in a workshop.

Check your understanding

Information missing from the source is…

Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.

Module 4 of 7

Build an instruction

Specify a task, an audience and evaluation criteria.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

A useful instruction specifies the desired result, audience and context. “Make it better” leaves much implicit; “prepare three examples for beginners” offers a clearer starting point.

Add a format and criteria: length, language, separation of facts and assumptions, and items to verify. Asking the tool to state its limits may help the reader, but those statements still need examination.

The first answer is a draft to evaluate. Compare it against your criteria, identify a specific problem, then refine the instruction. A better instruction makes evaluation easier; it does not guarantee accuracy.

Your task: choose an audience and task, then add at least two criteria. Copy the instruction if you want to keep it. Use fictional context only.

Add useful criteria
Use a fictional example. This text stays on the page.
What the request containsBefore

“Tell me about AI.”

Your instruction, assembled as you go

This page only assembles your instruction: no AI generates a response.

A precise instruction makes the result easier to evaluate. It does not guarantee accuracy. Choose your audience, task and at least two criteria to finish this experiment.

Check your understanding

After refining the instruction, what remains to do?

Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.

Module 5 of 7

Choose what to share

Identify personal information and reduce what you transmit.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

Before sending text to a service, ask what it reveals. A name, address, learning difficulty or customer record may concern a person. An internal project may also contain confidential information.

Removing a name is not always enough. Age, location, role and an unusual situation may identify someone. For learning or demonstration, a fully fictional example often avoids transmitting the real document.

The right action also depends on the tool and your organization’s rules: approved access, settings, retention and responsible people. If unsure, pause and ask for guidance. This activity does not replace those rules.

Your task: for each fictional card, choose share, replace with a fictional example or ask for approval. Your choice applies to the described situation.

File 1 of 3

An approved public announcement with no personal data. Your organization permits its use in this tool.

What do you choose?

File 2 of 3

For a demonstration, you want to use a real student record: name, family situation and difficulties.

What do you choose?

File 3 of 3

An internal document concerns an unannounced project. You do not know whether this tool is approved.

What do you choose?

Check your understanding

Is removing a name from a record always enough?

Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.

Module 6 of 7

Look for who is missing

See why an average can hide very different results.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

Evaluating a tool with one number can conceal differences between groups, languages or situations. An overall result does not necessarily describe each person’s experience.

In our fictional example, success is fixed at 95% for group A and 60% for group B. The slider changes only the sample composition. It does not train a model or change either group’s results.

A higher average may simply mean the better-served group is more common in the test. Before deciding, examine the relevant situations, who is underrepresented and the consequences of an error.

Your task: change group B’s share. Explain why the average changes even though both group results remain the same.

What does the average hide?

20%

Group results stay fixed. Only the composition changes.

Group A: 95% success
Group B: 60% success

Overall success 88%

A fictional sample of 100 cases · Illustrative example

Check your understanding

The average rises when group A becomes more common. This proves…

Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.

Module 7 of 7

Decide, then apply

Combine the habits in a complete scenario.

Planning guide: 8–⁠12 min, longer if you explore.

Understand what you see

You are organizing a workshop. A tool proposes a convincing announcement from your notes. Your job is to decide what to keep, what to correct and what must not be transmitted.

Use a simple method: define the intention, limit data, specify criteria, verify claims and identify who approves the result. If an error would have significant consequences, increase the level of checking or choose another method.

After the assessment, take the practice sheet. Choose a small task, define what you will check and compare the result with your usual method. A useful experiment may also conclude that AI does not help with that task.

Your task: answer the five decisions below. You can revisit modules and retry without a time limit.

Fictional notes

Library workshop

The proposed workshop lasts 90 minutes. The room holds 24 people. The date and facilitator are yet to be confirmed. The budget is not yet approved. A private participant list exists but is not needed to draft the announcement.

The announcement says “budget approved”. What should you do?

The announcement names a specialist absent from the notes.

Which document should you send for rephrasing?

Which instruction makes evaluation easier?

Who approves the announcement before publication?

Answer all five decisions to complete this module.

What should you keep from this course?

Five habits, for tomorrow.

  1. 1 Define the task and its usefulness.
  2. 2 Limit data to what is necessary and permitted.
  3. 3 Specify the audience, format and criteria.
  4. 4 Check claims against sources.
  5. 5 Decide who approves and when to stop.

Download the practice sheet Open the printable workbook

A journey, not a race.

The seven modules and checkpoints help you check your progress.

To go deeper with your group, an educator guides the discussion and adapts activities in an in-person workshop.

Continue together in a workshop

Want to go further?

The library stays open: four free resources, at your own pace.

Now imagine it in person.

With your team, on site. The questions come from your group, and our experienced teachers, led by an award-winning educator, answer them.

Book a workshop

A detailed quote within two business days.