7 modules · 60–90 min, as a planning estimate · Activities and a final assessment · No technical prerequisites
Teaching simulations, with no live AI. Progress stays on this device; entered text is not saved. Paid OYEE workshops take place exclusively in person.
Module 1 of 7
Open the machine
Understand what generative AI does and what it does not guarantee.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
Generative AI produces text, images or other content from patterns learned during training. For a language model, producing an answer involves successive predictions of tokens: words, word pieces or symbols.
Context includes the instructions and information available when an answer is generated. Describing the audience and task changes what the model may propose. That is not a fact-check.
Confident wording proves neither human understanding nor accuracy. The tool can help explore or rephrase ideas; a person still needs to judge the result for its intended use.
Your task: open at least two layers in the diagram. Change the audience. Identify where a person acts before and after generation.
Exploded view1 of 4
Message
What flows through
Explain AI to my team.
Your message
Explain AI to my team.
It starts with you. A question, a context, an intention.
The pieces
Explain · AI · to · my · team
Text becomes tokens: parts of words, words or symbols. The boundaries shown here are simplified.
The prediction
tool / system / technology
The model calculates possible continuations from context. A likely continuation can still be wrong.
Your judgment
Is it accurate? Useful? Suitable?
You compare against sources, identify limitations and decide what to use. Your judgment remains essential.
Assembled
Dissected
Choose a stage, or a layer of the drawing.
Teaching view: these layers represent stages, not a model’s physical architecture. Preset examples, no live AI.
Check your understanding
Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.
1Intention
Turn the view with the buttons, or drag it. Choose a part to see it up close.
Open the machine.
A teaching model, not the physical structure of a neural network. Examples and probabilities are illustrative.
The same words for everyone?
Show
Before
After
My insight notebook0 / 7
Kept in this browser when storage is available. No personal text.
The 3D view is unavailable on this device. Controls, explanations and all activities remain available.
Module 2 of 7
Prediction is not knowledge
Distinguish probability, variation and accuracy.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
A next token receives a probability based on context. The answer is built one piece at a time. A natural-sounding continuation can include invented information.
Temperature changes the distribution used for sampling. In this simulation, a low temperature concentrates possibilities; a higher temperature spreads them out. This setting does not measure truth.
Comparing two outputs can reveal variation. To know which is accurate, you need independent evidence: a source document, an observation or a check suited to the task.
Your task: try two contexts and two temperatures, then sample a word. Look at the shape of the probabilities, not only the chosen word.
Change the context and the temperature, then sample a word.
More concentrated
More varied
Temperature reshapes the probabilities. It measures neither truth nor intelligence.
Which word will come out?
Possible futuresIllustrative probabilities
Your samples
A likely continuation is not evidence. The same machine can produce a fluent sentence and a convincing mistake. Try two contexts and two temperatures, then sample a word.
Check your understanding
Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.
Module 3 of 7
Follow the evidence
Distinguish a supported, contradicted or unstated claim.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
A summary can add details absent from its source. Before sharing, separate the claims: who, what, when, how much, and supported by what evidence?
Supported means the source backs the claim. Contradicted means it says something incompatible. Not stated means it does not let you conclude. Missing information is not automatically proof of the opposite.
A reference supplied by a tool also needs checking: does it exist, does it say what is attributed to it, and is it relevant? A well-formatted citation can be incorrect.
Your task: classify all three claims using only the supplied document. Revise your choices by referring to the words in the source.
Fictional document
Meeting notes, Riverside Library
The team proposes a 90-minute workshop to explore AI. The room can hold 24 people. The date is yet to be confirmed. Free registration is being considered, but the budget has not yet been approved.
Your only source for this experiment.
Summary to check
Return to the source. Distinguish “supported”, “contradicted” and “not stated”. This is the reasoning we practise together in a workshop.
Check your understanding
Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.
Module 4 of 7
Build an instruction
Specify a task, an audience and evaluation criteria.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
A useful instruction specifies the desired result, audience and context. “Make it better” leaves much implicit; “prepare three examples for beginners” offers a clearer starting point.
Add a format and criteria: length, language, separation of facts and assumptions, and items to verify. Asking the tool to state its limits may help the reader, but those statements still need examination.
The first answer is a draft to evaluate. Compare it against your criteria, identify a specific problem, then refine the instruction. A better instruction makes evaluation easier; it does not guarantee accuracy.
Your task: choose an audience and task, then add at least two criteria. Copy the instruction if you want to keep it. Use fictional context only.
Use a fictional example. This text stays on the page.
What the request containsBefore
“Tell me about AI.”
Your instruction, assembled as you go
This page only assembles your instruction: no AI generates a response.
A precise instruction makes the result easier to evaluate. It does not guarantee accuracy. Choose your audience, task and at least two criteria to finish this experiment.
Check your understanding
Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.
Module 5 of 7
Choose what to share
Identify personal information and reduce what you transmit.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
Before sending text to a service, ask what it reveals. A name, address, learning difficulty or customer record may concern a person. An internal project may also contain confidential information.
Removing a name is not always enough. Age, location, role and an unusual situation may identify someone. For learning or demonstration, a fully fictional example often avoids transmitting the real document.
The right action also depends on the tool and your organization’s rules: approved access, settings, retention and responsible people. If unsure, pause and ask for guidance. This activity does not replace those rules.
Your task: for each fictional card, choose share, replace with a fictional example or ask for approval. Your choice applies to the described situation.
File 1 of 3
An approved public announcement with no personal data. Your organization permits its use in this tool.
File 2 of 3
For a demonstration, you want to use a real student record: name, family situation and difficulties.
File 3 of 3
An internal document concerns an unannounced project. You do not know whether this tool is approved.
Check your understanding
Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.
Module 6 of 7
Look for who is missing
See why an average can hide very different results.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
Evaluating a tool with one number can conceal differences between groups, languages or situations. An overall result does not necessarily describe each person’s experience.
In our fictional example, success is fixed at 95% for group A and 60% for group B. The slider changes only the sample composition. It does not train a model or change either group’s results.
A higher average may simply mean the better-served group is more common in the test. Before deciding, examine the relevant situations, who is underrepresented and the consequences of an error.
Your task: change group B’s share. Explain why the average changes even though both group results remain the same.
What does the average hide?
10%
90%
Group results stay fixed. Only the composition changes.
Group A: 95% success Group B: 60% success
Overall success 88%
A fictional sample of 100 cases · Illustrative example
Check your understanding
Explore the activity, then answer the checkpoint.
Module 7 of 7
Decide, then apply
Combine the habits in a complete scenario.
Planning guide: 8–12 min, longer if you explore.
Understand what you see
You are organizing a workshop. A tool proposes a convincing announcement from your notes. Your job is to decide what to keep, what to correct and what must not be transmitted.
Use a simple method: define the intention, limit data, specify criteria, verify claims and identify who approves the result. If an error would have significant consequences, increase the level of checking or choose another method.
After the assessment, take the practice sheet. Choose a small task, define what you will check and compare the result with your usual method. A useful experiment may also conclude that AI does not help with that task.
Your task: answer the five decisions below. You can revisit modules and retry without a time limit.
Fictional notes
Library workshop
The proposed workshop lasts 90 minutes. The room holds 24 people. The date and facilitator are yet to be confirmed. The budget is not yet approved. A private participant list exists but is not needed to draft the announcement.
Answer all five decisions to complete this module.